Building Inclusive Art Classrooms: Differentiation Strategies for a Broad Range of Learners

Building Inclusive Art Classrooms: Differentiation Strategies for a Broad Range of Learners

This blog was written by Dr. Kat Medill, RMCAD Assistant Professor Art History. 

An art classroom is more than a place to paint or sculpt; it is a vibrant ecosystem where students of all abilities, backgrounds, and learning styles converge to express, grow and question their unique perspectives. To create a classroom space where every student feels seen and supported, requires intentionality. By implementing proactive strategies like universal design for learning and culturally responsive teaching, educators can transform an art room into an environment where diversity is not just accommodated but celebrated. This guide explores how to build an inclusive art classroom that prioritizes equity and creativity for all.

Defining Inclusion and Differentiation in Art Education

Contemporary pedagogy in art education has shifted from a “one-size-fits-all” model to a more dynamic, student-centered approach. To truly foster an inclusive studio environment, it is essential to distinguish between the various methods of support and understand the theoretical frameworks that drive equity.

What “Inclusive” Means in a Studio-Based Classroom

Inclusive pedagogy is rooted in the “Social Model of Disability,” which suggests that a person is not disabled by their impairment but by the barriers existing in society. In an art room, this means that if a student cannot hold a traditional paintbrush, the “disability” is the brush itself, not the student’s hand. Inclusion, therefore, is the act of removing those systemic and physical barriers to allow for full creative agency.

In a studio setting, inclusive education means that the physical environment, the curriculum, and the social climate are all designed to welcome a broad spectrum of learners. It means a student with a 504 plan and an English Language Learner (ELL) can both thrive during the same lesson because the barriers to entry have been thoughtfully removed.

Differentiation vs Accommodation vs Modification

Understanding the distinction between these three terms is vital for any educator:

  • Differentiation: This is a proactive, classroom-wide strategy. The teacher plans a single lesson with multiple “entry points.” For example, if the goal is to explore “texture,” some students might work with clay, while others use digital brushes or collage materials. The learning goal remains the same, but the path to it varies.
  • Accommodation: These are specific supports provided to a student to help them meet the same standards as their peers. It does not change what they learn, but how they access it. Examples include providing a speech-to-text tool for an artist statement or using adaptive art tools like egg-grip brushes for students with limited fine motor control.
  • Modification: This involves fundamentally changing the learning goal or the complexity of the assignment. This is typically reserved for students with significant cognitive challenges where the standard curriculum is not yet accessible.
  • Modifications vs accommodations is a key distinction; modifications actually change what the student is expected to learn, often lowering the difficulty level for students with significant cognitive challenges.

Equity, Access, and High Expectations for All Learners

Inclusive teaching is rooted in the belief that all students can achieve high standards when given the right tools. Equity in art education means providing “just-right” challenges. By utilizing special education strategies, teachers ensure that rigor is maintained for every learner, regardless of their starting point.

Inclusion also extends to cultural identity. Embracing Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) in the art room means: 

  • Mirror and Window: Ensuring students see themselves reflected in the artists studied (Mirrors) while also gaining a view into cultures different from their own (Windows).
  • Critiquing Terminology: Modern pedagogy encourages students to question the power structures inherent in how we categorize art history.

Universal Design for Learning as a Planning Framework

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is the gold standard for inclusive curriculum planning. Rather than “retrofitting” a lesson for a specific student, UDL encourages teachers to design for the “margins” from the beginning.  

  • Multiple Means of Engagement: Tapping into interests by offering choice. Instead of “Draw a tree,” a UDL prompt might be “Create an image that represents growth,” allowing students to connect the theme to their own lives.
  • Multiple Means of Representation: Presenting information in various ways. A teacher might give a live demonstration, provide a pre-recorded video with captions, and have a “step-card” visual aid at the table.
  • Multiple Means of Action and Expression: Allowing students to show what they know through different media. A student might “submit” their final project as a sculpture, a digital painting, or a performance piece.

Multiple Means of Engagement in Art Projects

To foster high student engagement strategies, offer choices that tap into personal interests. This might include choice boards that allow students to pick their subject matter or project-based learning initiatives where art solves a real-world community problem.

Multiple Means of Representation for Instructions and Examples

Not all students process verbal instructions effectively. Use visual supports, such as visual schedules for classrooms and printed visual vocabulary for all students. Demonstrations should be recorded so students can re-watch them at their own pace.

Multiple Means of Action and Expression for Student Outcomes

Allow students to demonstrate skills in different ways. While one student might submit a traditional oil painting, another might use assistive technology in education to create a digital composition, while a third creates a 3D model. All can meet the same objective of “understanding color theory.”

Designing a Sensory-Friendly Art Room

Pedagogy now recognizes that the physical “sensory load” of an art room (smell of paint, bright lights, noise) can be a barrier. Inclusion today often includes:

  • Visual Schedules: Using icons to show the flow of the class period (e.g., Set up > Demo > Studio Time > Clean up).
  • Calm Corners: Dedicated spaces for self-regulation.
  • Flexible Seating: Allowing students to stand, sit on a ball, or work on the floor to meet their proprioceptive needs.

By weaving these pedagogical threads together, the art classroom becomes a site of Social-Emotional Learning (SEL), where the act of making art becomes a vehicle for building confidence, empathy, and community.

Sound, Light, and Visual Clutter, and How to Reduce Overload

Consider the “sensory load” of your room. Soften harsh fluorescent lighting with filters and organize materials into labeled bins to reduce visual “noise.” Providing noise-canceling headphones can be an effective behavior management strategy for students sensitive to the sound of scraping clay or chatty peers.

Seating, Movement Options, and Calm Corners

A flexible seating classroom allows students to choose where they work best, like standing at an easel, sitting on a floor cushion, or at a traditional desk. Every inclusive room should also feature a calm corner classroom space, which is a designated area for low sensory input where a student can go to self-regulate.

Material Choices for Sensory Needs, Allergies, and Safety

Be mindful of accessible art materials. Some students may have tactile defensiveness toward wet clay or sticky glue. Offering gloves or alternative materials, like polymer clay, ensures everyone can participate comfortably.

Differentiating Instruction Without Diluting Rigor

Differentiation is not about making things “easier,” it’s about providing different paths to the same mountain peak.

Tiered Prompts, Choice Boards, and Multi-Entry Assignments

Tiered assignments allow you to teach one concept while offering varying levels of challenge based on a student’s current skill level or IEP accommodations.

  • Tier 1 (Foundational): Focuses on basic comprehension and motor skills. For a unit on color theory, the task might be: “Create a 6-part color wheel using primary and secondary colors to demonstrate your understanding of mixing.” This builds essential fine motor supports and technical knowledge.
  • Tier 2 (Application): Moves into the “how” and “why.” The prompt might be: “Choose a monochromatic color scheme to paint a landscape, using tints and shades to create a sense of depth and atmospheric perspective.”
  • Tier 3 (Synthesis/Extension): Challenges students to use art as a language for complex ideas. The prompt might be: “Utilize a complementary color scheme to create an abstract portrait that represents a psychological conflict, such as ‘Calm vs. Chaos.’ 

Choice boards are a central component of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). They provide a “menu” of activities that allow students to play to their strengths. A typical art choice board might offer options based on:

  • Media: “Choose to complete this project using charcoal, digital software, or found-object collage.”
  • Process: “You may follow the step-by-step tutorial, look at a finished example and reverse-engineer it, or propose your own experimental method.”
  • Output: “Demonstrate your understanding of ‘Proportion’ by either drawing a realistic figure, creating a caricature, or filming a video essay comparing the proportions of two different sculptures.”

By providing these choices, you naturally incorporate multilingual learner strategies (allowing a visual or non-verbal output) and support executive function by letting students choose the workflow that feels least overwhelming to them.

A “Multi-Entry” assignment is designed so that the initial task is extremely simple to start (the low floor), but the potential for complexity is limitless (the high ceiling). This is a hallmark of inclusive education because it doesn’t “track” students into separate groups; everyone starts the same journey.

  • The “Entry Point”: All students are given a simple prompt, such as “Create a series of marks on a page.” This is accessible to a student with a 504 plan who may struggle with complex instructions.
  • The Evolution: Through scaffolded instruction, the teacher introduces new layers of complexity. “Now, group your marks to create an area of high contrast.” Then, “Use those areas of contrast to imply a 3D form.”  The Result: One student may finish with an expressive, high-contrast abstract drawing (meeting the objective of “Value”), while another may take it further to create a photorealistic charcoal portrait. Both students have engaged with the same core design principles.

Crucially, differentiating through these methods does not mean “watering down” the art. You are assessing the same process-based assessment standards for everyone, such as intentionality, growth, or critical thinking, while allowing the physical and conceptual evidence of that learning to look different for every student. This approach ensures equity and access while maintaining the high expectations necessary for a thriving, professional-level art studio.

Scaffolds for Planning: Thumbnails, Templates, and Step Cards

Scaffolded instruction is essential in art. Provide visual schedules or “step cards” that break a complex project into manageable chunks. For students struggling with fine motor skills, providing a template or a “starter” image can bridge the gap between idea and execution.

Chunking, Timers, and Predictable Routines for Executive Function

Executive function support is essential because students might struggle with “task initiation” (starting) and “time blindness” (not knowing how long a task takes).  Predictability reduces anxiety and allows more “brain space” for creativity.

By implementing these strategies, you move from being a “manager of behavior” to a “facilitator of independence.”

Chunking is the process of taking a complex, multi-week project and breaking it into small, manageable “bites.” In art, a project like “Oil Painting a Still Life” can be overwhelming.

  • The Technique: Instead of giving the whole rubric at once, provide a “Project Map.”
  • The Breakdown: Chunk the project into phases: 1. Thumbnail Sketches, 2. Canvas Priming, 3. Underpainting, 4. Layering, 5. Finishing.
  • The Benefit: Students feel a sense of accomplishment at each “checkpoint,” preventing the “freeze” response that happens when a task feels too large.

Visual timers support students who experience “time blindness,” where 20 minutes can feel like five minutes or two hours.

  • The Technique: Use a visual timer (like a Time Timer or a digital countdown displayed on a screen). These timers use a red disk or a decreasing bar to show the physical volume of time disappearing.
  • The Application: Set specific “sprints.” For example: “We have 10 minutes of silent sketching. When the red disappears, we will move to the sinks.”
  • The Benefit: This reduces the “startle response” of a sudden transition or a loud bell, allowing students to wind down their creative flow gradually.

When a student knows exactly how the first five minutes and last ten minutes of class will go, they don’t have to use brain power to wonder what is happening next.

  • The Technique: Visual Schedules. Post a daily agenda in the same spot every day. Use icons for students who are Multilingual Learners or have reading disabilities.
    • Example: [Icon of a Chair] (Sit/Listen) -> [Icon of a Pencil] (Studio Time) -> [Icon of a Sponge] (Clean up).
  • The Application: Consistent Clean-up Roles. Every student should have a predictable “Studio Role.” When the “Clean-up Song” or signal plays, everyone knows their specific job (e.g., Table Captain, Sink Monitor, Scrap Paper Collector).
  • The Benefit: By automating the “boring” parts of class through routine, you clear the mental clutter. This creates more brain space for creativity, as students aren’t anxious about transitions or missing instructions.

For students with IEP accommodations related to executive function, you might also provide individual checklists at their desks.

  • Self-Monitoring: A small laminated card that says: “Did I: 1. Sketch? 2. Outline? 3. Clean my brushes?”
  • The Result: The student learns to self-regulate rather than relying on the teacher to tell them what to do next. This builds student agency in art and prepares them for the professional autonomy required in higher education or a creative career.

Accommodations for IEPs and 504 Plans in Art

Implementing the Individualized Education Program (IEP) and Section 504 Plan (504) support systems in the art studio is not just a legal obligation, it represents a commitment to “best practice” teaching that benefits the entire classroom. By removing physical and cognitive barriers, educators allow every student’s creative voice to be heard.

Understanding the Frameworks: IEP vs. 504

  • IEP (Individualized Education Program): A legal document developed for students who require specialized instruction and related services to make progress in school. In the art room, an IEP often focuses on specific goals related to motor skills, communication, or social interaction.
  • 504 Plan: Derived from Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, this plan provides accommodations for students with disabilities that interfere with their ability to learn in a general education setting. Unlike an IEP, a 504 plan typically focuses on environment and access rather than specialized instruction.

Fine Motor Supports: Adaptive Tools and Alternative Techniques

For students with physical disabilities or limited dexterity, the physical act of “making” can be the primary barrier. Adaptive art tools, such as brushes with chunky foam grips, weighted pencils to reduce tremors, or table-top easels that bring the work closer to the student, can be transformative.

When traditional methods remain inaccessible, use alternative assessments. For example, a student who cannot grip a paintbrush might use stamp art, mouth-painting tools, or digital art software that allows for eye-tracking or touch-pad manipulation. These methods ensure the student is still meeting the learning objective of “creative expression,” even if the medium changes.

Attention and Processing Supports: Simplified Steps, Extra Time

Students with ADHD or processing disorders often find the high-sensory environment of an art room distracting. Common 504 accommodations include:

  • Preferential Seating: Placing a student away from high-traffic areas like sinks or supply closets to minimize distractions.
  • Extended Time: Allowing students more time to reach the “flow state” of creation without the anxiety of a looming deadline.
  • Simplified Documentation: Replacing a long list of verbal instructions with a visual “checklist” of project requirements. Breaking a project into three clear steps helps students manage their cognitive load.

Behavioral and Social Supports: Roles, Visual Cues, and Break Plans

Effective behavior management strategies rely on making expectations visible rather than just audible.

  • Visual Cues: Use a “First/Then” board, a simple visual aid that shows a required task followed by a preferred activity (e.g., First clean your brushes, Then five minutes of free drawing).
  • Studio Roles: Assigning specific roles during the clean-up transition (such as “Table Captain” or “Paper Manager”) provides a predictable structure and a sense of purpose.
  • Break Plans: Establish a pre-arranged signal for when a student needs to visit a calm corner to self-regulate before a frustration leads to a behavioral outburst.

Supporting English Language Learners (ELLS) and Multilingual Learners (MLS)

While art is often celebrated as a universal language, the instruction used to teach it is not. To create an equitable studio, educators must implement specific strategies to support English Language Learners (ELLs), students who are in the process of acquiring English proficiency, and Multilingual Learners (MLs), who use multiple languages in their daily lives.

By intentionally scaffolding language, you ensure that a student’s artistic growth is not limited by their current level of English fluency.

Visual Vocabulary: Icons, Labels, and Picture Dictionaries

For ELL and ML students, abstract terms become concrete when paired with imagery.

  • Dual-Labeling: Label every material in the studio (e.g., “Charcoal,” “Kneaded Eraser,” “Acrylic Paint”) with both the English word and a clear, high-contrast icon or photograph.
  • Technique Dictionaries: Create a “Visual Dictionary” for the classroom. Instead of just defining “stippling” or “shading” with words, provide a picture of the action and the resulting texture. This allows students to connect the English term directly to a visual artistic action.

Language Objectives Paired With Art Objectives

Every lesson should have two types of goals: a content objective (the art skill) and a language objective (the linguistic skill needed to discuss that art).

  • The Art Goal: “Students will create a balanced composition using geometric shapes.”
  • The Language Goal: “Students will use the academic adjectives ‘symmetrical’ and ‘asymmetrical’ to describe their work during a peer critique.” Pairing these ensures that students are not just doing the art, but are also gaining the specific academic vocabulary required to participate in the professional art world.

Sentence Stems for Artist Statements, Critiques, and Reflection

Written and oral communication can be significant barriers for ML students, often leading to “silence” that is mistaken for a lack of understanding. Sentence stems act as a “starter motor” for their thoughts.

  • Critique Stems: Provide a printed list of starters, such as: “I notice that the artist used [blank] to create [blank].” or “The focal point of this piece is [blank] because…”
  • Artist Statement Stems: For reflections, use stems like: “I chose this color palette because…” or “My work was inspired by the theme of [blank].”

Using inclusive critique stems allows students to participate in class discussions with confidence. These stems should focus on observation and inquiry rather than judgment, which reduces the “affective filter” (anxiety) that often hinders language production. By providing these scaffolds, you transition the student from passive observer to an active, vocal member of the studio community.

Assessment and Alternative Demonstrations of Learning

Standardized testing rarely captures the growth in an art student. Process-based assessment focuses on the journey, not just the finished product.

Process-Based Rubrics and Growth Evidence

An art rubric for growth should reward effort, experimentation, and problem-solving. If a student’s fine motor supports mean their lines aren’t “clean,” they can still receive an ‘A’ for their sophisticated use of composition and color.

Options Beyond Writing: Audio, Video, Photos, and Conferencing

Offer audio reflection  options. Instead of a written artist statement, let students record a 30-second video explaining their piece. Documenting progress through photos of work-in-progress is a great way to show growth.

Self-Assessment and Goal Setting That Builds Agency

Empower students by letting them set their own goals. Use “I can” statements to help students track their own skills, fostering student agency in art.

Inclusive Materials and Curriculum Choices

What we teach is as important as how we teach it. Culturally responsive art education ensures that all students see themselves reflected in the curriculum.

Diverse Artists and Global Traditions Without Tokenism

To create a truly inclusive curriculum, educators must move beyond the Western canon, or the traditional collection of white, European male artists that have historically dominated art history. Instead of “tokenizing” artists by including them only during specific heritage months, educators should integrate a diverse range of contemporary, living artists into the core curriculum year-round.

When implementing Global Inclusive Education, an approach that values the educational traditions and philosophies of all cultures, avoid a “tourist” curriculum. A tourist approach only skims the surface of a culture through food, festivals, or superficial crafts. Instead, engage in deep inquiry into the spiritual, historical, and social meanings behind global traditions. This ensures students respect the context of the work rather than just replicating its aesthetic.

Multiple Ways to Connect Themes to Students’ Lives

Inclusive pedagogy requires making art relevant to every student’s unique lived experience. To do this, ensure that project prompts are open-ended. For example, a traditional prompt asking students to draw “their house” can inadvertently alienate students experiencing housing insecurity or those in foster care.

Instead, use broader, conceptual prompts like “draw a place where you feel safe” or “create a representation of ‘home’.” This is a cornerstone of trauma-informed teaching or pedagogy (Harris and Fallot, 2001), a pedagogical framework that recognizes the impact of past trauma on a student’s ability to learn and create. By offering flexible themes, you respect the diverse living situations and emotional realities of all students.

Trauma-Informed Choices, Opt-Out Paths, and Content Warnings

Creating a safe art classroom setup involves acknowledging that some art topics, historical events, or visual imagery can be deeply distressing. To support student mental health, utilize the following supports:

  • Content Warnings (CWs): Provide a brief heads-up before showing images or discussing topics that involve violence, illness, or sensitive social issues. This allows students to mentally prepare or step away if needed.
  • Opt-Out Paths: Always provide an “opt-out” option or a pre-planned alternative prompt. This ensures that no student is forced to engage with a topic that triggers a traumatic response.
  • Building Trust First: In trauma-informed teaching, the “Safety” phase must come before the “Expression” phase. Establishing clear boundaries and predictable routines helps build the trust necessary for students to eventually engage in deep emotional expression through their art.

Family, Specialist, and Team Collaboration

Art teachers should not work in a vacuum. You are part of a larger team dedicated to the student’s success.

Partnering With Special Educators, Speech, OT, and Counselors

Communicate regularly with the specialists in your building. An Occupational Therapist (OT) can give you ideas for fine motor supports, while a Special Educator can help you refine your IEP accommodations.

Communicating Accommodations and Progress to Families

Share the successes! Send home photos of a student using adaptive art tools to create something they are proud of. Building a bridge with families ensures that the inclusive art classroom extends beyond the school walls.

Documentation: Notes, Photos, and Student Work Samples

Keep a “differentiation planner” to document what works. This data is invaluable during IEP meetings and helps you track the effectiveness of your special education strategies.

Case Studies: Global and School-Based Examples

United States: UDL Choice Boards and Process Rubrics in Middle School Art

In many U.S. middle schools, teachers use choice boards to manage large, diverse classes. By using a process-based assessment model, teachers focus on the student’s ability to iterate on their ideas rather than just the final craft.

Canada: Inclusive Studio Routines With OT-Informed Tool Adaptations

Canadian art educators often collaborate with OTs to integrate fine motor supports directly into the studio, using tools like “spring-loaded” scissors that assist students with low hand strength.

United Kingdom: SEND Supports and Visual Instruction Systems

In the UK, the focus on “Special Educational Needs and Disabilities” (SEND) has led to highly sophisticated visual supports, where every step of a complex printmaking process is mapped out with high-contrast icons.

Finland: Student Agency, Calm Classrooms, and Flexible Assessment

Finnish schools prioritize student agency in art, allowing learners to dictate their own projects and timelines, supported by a low-stress, sensory-friendly classroom environment.

Australia: Culturally Responsive Art With Sensory-Friendly Studios

Australia leads in culturally responsive teaching by integrating Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives through deep community consultation, paired with modern sensory friendly classroom tools.

Singapore: Multilingual Supports and Visual Vocabulary for Critique

In Singapore’s diverse schools, visual vocabulary for ell and sentence stems for critique are standard, ensuring that students can discuss complex art concepts in multiple languages.

Online Programs: Accessibility Tools, Captions, and Alternative Submissions

Modern accessible online art learning utilizes captions and accessibility tools to ensure students can learn from home. At RMCAD, we prioritize universal access in studio settings, whether on-campus or virtual.

Ready to teach the next generation of learners?

Building an inclusive art classroom is a journey of continuous learning and adaptation, and RMCAD’s Bachelor of Fine Arts in Art Education (available online and on campus) helps provide the foundation for these skills and more to future educators. By embracing universal design for learning, differentiated instruction, and culturally responsive teaching, you create a space where art is truly for everyone. Whether you are implementing sensory-friendly classroom changes or utilizing adaptive art tools, every small step toward accessibility makes a huge difference in the life of a student. To learn more about RMCAD’s Art Education Programs, request information today. 

Bibliography

Carello, Janice, and Lisa D. Butler. “Practicing What We Teach: Trauma-Informed Educational Practice.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 35, no. 3 (2015): 262–78.

Cole, Susan F., Anne Eisner, Michael Gregory, and Joel Ristuccia. Helping Traumatized Children Learn: Creating and Advocating for Trauma-Sensitive Schools. Massachusetts Advocates for Children Trauma and Learning Policy Initiative, 2013.http://tlpi.jacksonwhelan.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/HTCL-Vol-2-Creating-and-Advocating-for-TSS.pdf.

CAST. Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 2.2. Wakefield, MA: CAST, 2018.http://udlguidelines.cast.org.

Elliot, Dorcas M., Paula Bjelac, Roger D. Fallot, Laura S. Markoff, and Beth Glover Reed. “Trauma-Informed or Trauma-Denied: Principles and Implementation of Trauma-Informed Services for Women.” Journal of Community Psychology 33, no. 4 (2005): 461–77.

Fallot, Roger D., and Maxine Harris. Trauma-Informed Services: A Self-Assessment and Planning Protocol. Washington, DC: Community Connections, 2006.https://children.wi.gov/Documents/CCTICSelf-AssessmentandPlanningProtocol0709.pdf.

Gay, Geneva. Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2018.

Gerber, Beverly Levett, and Elizabeth F. Guay, eds. Reaching and Teaching Students with Special Needs through Art. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association, 2006.

Gerber, Beverly Levett. “What Is Art Education for Students with Disabilities?” In VSA Arts Professional Papers, Vol. 1, 4–10. Washington, DC: John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, 2004.https://www.kennedy-center.org/globalassets/education/networks-conferences–research/research–resources/vsa-resources/parents-and-educators/professional_papers_vol_1.pdf.

Glass, Don, Anne Meyer, and David H. Rose. “Universal Design for Learning and the Arts.” Harvard Educational Review 83, no. 1 (2013): 98–119.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277926158_Universal_Design_for_Learning_and_the_Arts

Keifer-Boyd, Karen. “Inclusive Art Education.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press, 2021. Last modified August 31, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1348.

St. Andrews, Alayne. Trauma and Resilience: An Adolescent Provider Toolkit. San Francisco, CA: Adolescent Health Working Group, 2013.https://ahwg.org/download/trauma-and-resilience-2013/.

Szekely, George, and Julie Alsip Bucknam. Art Teaching: Elementary through Middle School. New York: Routledge, 2012.

National Art Education Association. “Position Statement on Art Education and Social Justice.” Adopted March 2015, Revised March 2021.https://www.arteducators.org/resources/platform-and-position-statements/naea-position-statements-curriculum/1302-naea-position-statement-on-social-justice-art-curriculum/

Tomlinson, Carol Ann. The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2014.Wexler, Alice. Art and Disability: The Political and Social Struggles of Facing Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

Categories
Archives

We're accepting applications!  No fee, Apply Today!

Classes Starting Soon!

Rocky Mountain College of Art + Design Campus

No Application fee